Was it an easy shoot? If there were difficulties what were they?
The shoot for the boat that rocked was a easy shoot, but when you think about it you have to think about the weather and the was the boat was rocking because you wanted the right continuity there but they didn't want to make the shoot difficult. Richard Curtis had to re edite this film because people said that it was too long but even after editing they still said it was too long.
Were there tensions between any of the creative personnel, often known as the talent?
There couldn't of been any tension between any of the creative personal, because Richard Curtis was the only one that had to argue with himself, he could of had arguments with himself but then that means he doesn't trust himself, but the atmosphere on the boat most of been good because there was so many people on the boat and they all was friends because they had to be cause they was out there for a long time shooting, it would of been putting stress on Richard because he was on his own but i think that the team would of helped him get through them times.
Was any part of the film shot on location? If so where? why were some locations chosen over others? Were cost factors?
Most of this film was shot on one location, and that was the boat, it was cheaper to keep all the shots on the boat because then they don't have to keep moving about all they would have to pay for is keeping the boat out there. The other location was the London streets they would of had to pay for, but they kept them theme all the way through the film because the street was like a 50's street and it looked good.
Where there any difficulties with casting or with acquiring the starts/actors the producer wanted?
No there was no difficulties getting the actors because, when they was writing the film they wrote certain roles for certain actors.
How significant was casting to reach specific audiences?
There was a range of casting in this film, i thought that this was a good idea because then it would make many different people watch the film and that means it results in many more people watching it then they thought that means that they will be spending more money to go and see it and then that means that there making more money for this film.
What did the studio film cost to make? How much did the stars get? Where did the budget go? Was the film shot within budget? Was it ever in danger of going over budget?
The Budgeting for this film was £30 million, that seems a lot of money but it really wasn't because they had to pay for costumes, locations, and all the equipment, but the stars that was in this film got the most money, witch i thought was good.
Were there any changes to the scripted during the production? How many changes or Re-writes? Did the same scriptwriters stay on bored all the time, or were they replaced?
There wasn't any changes in the script majourly, but they just had to make the film shorter because people thought it was too long.
List some of the key people who made contributions to the production and highlight some of their individual contributions?
- Richard Curtis- Screen Writter.
- Hilary beavon jones- Producer.
- Adam Richards- Location manager.
- Mark tildesly- Production designer.
- Eric Fellner - Production.
- Ema frenel -2nd unit Director
- James biddle - Productioin manager.
- Emma Hickox- Editor.
- Danny cohen - Cinematography.
What were the technological issues for the studio for producing and distributing the film?
No comments:
Post a Comment